Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Media violence: Pointing at the wrong culprit

Nowadays, force-out in the streets is fitting commonplace. Headlines atomic number 18 screaming of assaults and other senseless crimes. Thus, it is necessary to understand what gos violence to minimize, if not stop, its prevalence in society. In this age of technology, media is very powerful among people be ca-ca of its global reach. Thus, there have been arguments that media violence translates to societal violence. by the years, there has been an increase in the quantity of violence, and media has been transforming to a to a greater extent sexual, graphic, and sadistic media. Because of the technological development, bullets exploding in peoples brains were seen in slow motion in movies. wrestling fans cheer over hard-hitting action, and one particular boob tube games, gilded Theft Auto, goal is murdering as many people as possible. Moreover, passing uncultivated lyrics are common in music. The Web makes access to just these kinds of media easily accessible as well as c ontains violent materials (Vidal, Clemente, & Espinosa, 2003).The heading of cruelty in different types of media means that it is appealing to people. Violence is integrated to media because it is what sells to people. The question now is, Does it cause societal violence?Many count that people exposed to violence in the media have a more than aggressive behavior. Media has been accused of teaching children how to kill people. However, the actual connection amongst media and violence is yet to be established (Bushman & Anderson, 2001), and some researchers believe that blaming media is only one way for others who refuse to believe that the actual violence is seen at home and in the community. Indeed, guns, drugs, alcohol, and poverty heavily influence youth, much more than media does.Those who are believed to be influenced by media live in ghetto cities where people largely are in the low socioeconomic bracket and belong to the minority groups. A common factor among these peo ple is the presence of abuse and violence, compensate before the media became a part of the popular culture. Rap music, accused for its violent lyrics, originated from these areas, a reflection of the experiences of those who created the music. Artists of metal music are said to foment violent tendencies among youth, and Marilyn Manson was blamed for the Columbine shooting.Similar to rappers, metal music artists commonly had poor upbringing and exposed to violence throughout their childhood. Cases against the rock bands claiming that they are responsible for influencing the violence in teenagers were dismissed because the teenagers were under the influence of drugs and, likewise to most artists, have depressing lives. In reality, music does not cause violence rather, musicians are only expressing the violence that they experienced in the society.Approximately 90% of violent youths were exposed to violence at homes, were abused, and have depressing lives, until now before they l earned how to listen to music.As regards movies depicting violent scenes, these only slightly increase aggression (Freedman, 2002). Similarly to music, movies only emulate reality, and the nontextual matter only help to make films as real life as possible. Again, it is the poor home environment that raises a violent child. As an example, movies, animes, and video games in Japan are more violent than in the linked States, but are there any reported incidents of shootings by teenagers at school? None. Furthermore, there are less incidence of crimes committed by teenagers.Indeed, violence in society is rapidly rising, but people should not point their fingers at the wrong culpritmedia. Media violence does not cause societal violence rather, violence is only portrayed in media. Although it is neat that violence in media increases aggression in children, ultimately, proper upbringing is indwelling to ensure that a child does not grow to be a violent person. Instead of focusing on med ia violence, people should focus on the real problempoverty, drugs and alcohol, loose gun laws, and domestic violence.ReferencesBushman, B. & Anderson, C. (2001). Media violence and the American public Scientific factversus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56(67), 477489.Freedman, J. (2002). Media violence and its effect on aggression Assessing the scientificevidence. Toronto University of Toronto Press.Vidal, M.A., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. (2003). Types of media violence and degree ofacceptance in

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.