Position paper †Accreditation Essay

Hello,This assignment is for a subject called case Management for Health ServicesAssignment 2 Position paper AccreditationWeighting 20% aloofness 1000 wordsAccreditation schedules for health serve or facilities atomic number 18 not useful. Discuss this statement with author to specific accreditation programs. In your response substantiate your claims with reference to literature.The assignment will be marked exploitation the following criteria1. Style, judicature and presentation 10% 2 marks2. Demonstrated understanding of principles and frameworks of accreditation 30% 6 marks3. Description of strengths and/or weaknesses of accreditation programs 30% 6 marks4. Identification of opportunities for improvements in accreditation programs 30% 6 marks.Introduction Accreditation is a process of certifying and approving that the services or products produced by a certain body of rules meet with certain standards in musical note. In Australia, one of the organisations that provid e accreditation for hospitals and some other health care physical compositions is the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS). The main objective of this presidency is to improve the quality of health care in Australian hospitals. ACHS is an independent organization that works for non-profit purposes and conducts look backs of the performance, quality assessments, etc, during the accreditation process.It was formed in the year 1974, and some(prenominal) other organizations such as the Australian Medical Council, the Australian Healthcare Association, and the medical colleges association live with approved accreditation by the ACHS. For determining the standards in the level of health care, a committee formed containing representatives from various sectors of the race including the general public, government, hospitals, etc. The Council members vote for the Board of Directors.In the year 1996, the ACHS had launched a unique quality program titled Evaluation and Quali ty Improvement Program (EQuIP), the main aim of which was to deliver customer-oriented health care services to the people. A systematic external peer review process was set in place to close monitor the program. The ACHS has about an 800-organization subscription and in addition acts as a consultancy to several other organizations throughout the world (ACHS, 2007). corpse Accreditation is a means of issuing trust. Any consumer who requires healthcare services desires those healthcare services to be of well quality and ensuring safety. It fag be understood that in healthcare there are certain kernel of risks, which tolerate only be reduced to a certain extent. Accreditation is one of the means by which these risks can be reduced and quality care can be ensured.The patients should identify means by which these risks can be reduced. Through accreditation, the entire process of providing medical care is well documented, besides being hit proof. This would ensure that a process wo uld be setup that would be based on strong evidences, ensuring bust patient management. Accreditation is often determined by the healthcare and the accreditation organization in strong technical price that have to be fulfilled (ACHS, 2007).In the year 2006, the Australian Commission that maintained safety and quality in the healthcare sector felt accreditation standards needed to be improved. They also felt that an independent review process was needed to raise the level of adherence to quality standards in healthcare organizations in Australia. The organization felt that accreditation is a process to publicly recognize the achievements and adherence of the healthcare organizations national standards.Accreditation should be do available to all public and private sector organizations, and at different levels including community-based, private-health setups and tertiary healthcare organizations. The accreditation organization should function independent of the organizations that it would be accrediting. This would ensure that the performance and the standards that are present in the organization are stipulation no bias by the accrediting organization (ACHS, 2007).Benefits of the accreditation system greater involvement of the public and the healthcare organizationsThe clinicians who are responsible for providing quality care can be involved.Improves the community confidence levels in the healthcare system break away risk management in patient careBetter conformation with the laws (reduction in medical malpractice cases)Patient safety standards are improvedEducation of the staff members towards developing good practices supply of professional advice and guidanceStaff education and trainingDeveloping strong mission statements, values and objectives for the organizationThe human re line of descent processes can be erectively handledCompliance with the standards imposed by the regulatory bodiesBetter management of insurance claims and those of third partiesRed uction in the insurance costsBetter handling of the organization and the managementBetter flow of informationBetter decision-making processesCo-ordination can be improvedBuilding a proper evaluation systemDeveloping areas in which priority and attention is required (Australian Commission on guard and Quality in Health manage, 2007 & JCAHO, 2007)Disadvantages would also be applicable, including Huge costs of accreditation which is finally passed on to the patientEmphasis on resources such as human, support systems, etc.The standards have to be continually updated, changing the area of concentrationAccreditation would concentrate on improving structure rather than servicesGreater attention on increasing collaboration and partnershipIt may be difficult to streamline the processesAccreditation may not have an effect over the outcomesThere may be huge emphasis on competition present in the marketNeed to subscribe to accreditation by more than one organization (PHF, 1997)In the year 20 07, the Australian Commission on sanctuary and Quality in Health Care gave an alternate model for accreditation of healthcare organizations. Consultation with the stakeholders helped to identify the deficiencies in the current system and to develop a better one. The idea was to apply this new alternative accreditation system across all the sectors of healthcare in a phased manner.Characteristics of this new accreditation system Implementing certain reformsBringing about certain standards in the Australian healthcare systemThe system was to be developed in association with the stakeholdersImprove the quality standardsImprove the compliance levels with the rules in the healthcare organizationEnsure evidence-based practicesImprove the monitoring systemSupport mutual identificationImprove the participation levelsImprove the assessments levels, methods and surveysObligations to be imposed so that the organization adheres to the standards (Australian Commission on sentry go and Quality in Health Care, 2007).Conclusion It can be said that the entire process of accreditation involve to be setup in such a way that emphasis is given only in improving the patient care and satisfaction. All the meaningless process and structures that do not have an effect over improving the patient care should be removed. The accreditation organization should ensure that such a system of accreditation is practically applicable by various types of healthcare organizations. Not much emphasis should be given on costs. Even organizations that are providing cost-effective care and are meeting with reasonable standards should be provided accreditation. Accreditation should also be a voluntary system and not a compulsory one. Different levels of accreditation should also be provided (PHF, 1997).ReferencesAustralian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). About US. Online, Available http//www.achs.org.au/whatwedo/, Accessed 2008, environ 17.Australian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007 ). Mission, vision and values. Online, Available http//www.achs.org.au/missionvisionvalues/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). What accreditation means. Online, Available http//www.achs.org.au/whataccredmeans/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). ACHS Position Statements. Online, Available http//www.achs.org.au/positionstatements/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2007). UPDATE Review of National Safety and Quality Accreditation Standards November 2007. Online, Available http//www.safetyandquality.org/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/accreditation, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2007). Draft An Alternatvie Model for Safety and Qualtiy Accreditation.Barnes, A.M. (2001). Healthcare Law Desk Reference. Ali-Aba. http//books.google.co.in/books?id=KS5xke6-DEgC&dq=accreditation+advantages+healthcare&sou rce=gbs_summary_s&cad=0JCAHO (2007). Benefits of Joint Commission Accreditation. Online, Available http//www.jointcommission.org/HTBAC/benefits_accreditation.htm, Accessed 2008, March 17.JCAHO (2007). PSP Fact Sheet. Online, Available http//www.jcipatientsafety.org/fpdf/ICPS/PSP%20Fact%20Sheet%20with%20New%20Logo.doc, Accessed 2008, March 17. human race Health Foundation (1998). Accreditation A Study of Issues and Characteristics Applicable to Public Health. Online, Available http//www.phf.org/Reports/Accreditation1/final_report.htm, Accessed 2008, March 17.