Air Quality and Climate Change as Integrated Policy

An corporate approach to tackling give vent eccentric and mode change makes sound sense. The topics of pains quality and climate change are interrelated, so policies surrounding the both problems should be manoeuvreed using an integrated approach. The emissions that pollute our publicise and those that immediate the planet have common sources vehicles, buildings, power generation and industry. These pollutants and activities that affect the air we breathe also have a signifi tint impact on the climate change the earth is experiencing.Integrating air befoulment control and climate change policies helps to achieve sustainable development and a low speed of light society that benefit all. M either benefits are realized through incorporate approaches and policies to air quality and climate change. One benefit of integrated policies is that the worth to implement the policies is more than cost effective. Integrating climate and air pollution control programs leads to signif icant cost savings and important benefits to human health and the environment (Kuylenstierna and Hicks, 2008).Also, climate policies and decisions are felt in the future opus policies improving air quality are felt in the hither and now. Also, an integrated polity would avoid unintentional trade-offs. That is when policy is introduced to benefit whizz area without consideration of how it result affect the other in these cases, forbid impacts felt by one area may outweigh the true(a) benefits that the policy was designed to bring (Environmental Protection UK, 2011). Another benefit of integration is the ability to prioritize actions and weigh the advantages and disadvantages of the action for each problem.There will be obstacles to realizing an integrative approach to air quality and climate change. Political obstacles can include lobbyist and interest groups that hold significant influence in the policy-making arena. If proposed actions increase costs to manufacture or produ ce energy, the interest groups and the lobbyists will be vocal about their disapproval and may influence a political leaders decision to implement environmental policies. In addition, singulars may voice their concerns about costs associated with integrated policies.For example, if the cost of a car goes up to meet emissions regulations, individuals will voice their opinions during election time by voting the out the policy maker. Finally, the science behind the problems take to be clearly communicated and understood by all. The science wants to be valid and proven as well. If the science is correct, individuals will more right away accept any policy changes. Currently, there are opposing views on air quality and climate change that contri entirelye to the confusion umpteen realize surrounding the environmental problems the world is facing.A fragmented approach to address these environmental issues may do more harm than good. One policy that is meant to help with climate chang e may pose many disadvantages to air quality. In a compartmentalized approach, the effect to the other issue is not considered. This can also add additional costs and resources to amend or fix a problem created through a fragmented approach. transgress approaches also contribute to the influence interest groups and lobbyists can have on the implementation of policies. Finally, a fragmented approach can be indecipherable and communicate competing priorities.The unclear and fragmented message presented to the public lessens the impact and the life-or-death need to act on the issues we face surrounding air quality and climate change. Individuals are the drivers of larger processes of change involving organizations and political systems, especially in democratic societies (Liverani, 2009). In addition, as consumers, individuals hold a reservoir of palliation capacity. Roughly 40 percent of OECD emissions result from decisions by individualstravel, heating, and food purchases. U. S. o useholds like a shot account for roughly 35 percent of national CO2 emissions more in absolute terms than the entire U. S. industrial sector and any other country bar China (Liverani, 2009). Reflecting on these numbers, the impact that individual behaviors and actions demonstrate the negative consequences citizenry have to the air quality as well as the significant contribution to the climate change problem. However, passel must not only be informed, concerned, or understand the problems and issues, the people must act to improve air quality conditions and stop the quick rate of climate change.People need to accept responsibility for their waste and their emissions. polity makers have used economic and market mechanism to drive adoption, but this strategy is not all that is needed. Understanding their impact and acting on their impact without financial incentives is crucial to improve the quality of the air we breathe and slow the climate change we are experiencing. New social norms need to be established through effective marketing and communication of the problems.?